ক The writer bases her argument on another argument that contains circular reasoning.

খ The writer has illogically classified two disparate groups together when there is no relationship between them, except that they both have the same attribute.

গ The writer has made a mistaken analogy between two dissimilar qualities.

ঘ The writer has used a fallacy which involves the ambiguous description of animals by their color.

ক The writer bases her argument on another argument that contains circular reasoning.

খ The writer has illogically classified two disparate groups together when there is no relationship between them, except that they both have the same attribute.

গ The writer has made a mistaken analogy between two dissimilar qualities.

ঘ The writer has used a fallacy which involves the ambiguous description of animals by their color.

ক The writer bases her argument on another argument that contains circular reasoning.

খ The writer has illogically classified two disparate groups together when there is no relationship between them, except that they both have the same attribute.

গ The writer has made a mistaken analogy between two dissimilar qualities.

ঘ The writer has used a fallacy which involves the ambiguous description of animals by their color.

ক The writer bases her argument on another argument that contains circular reasoning.

খ The writer has illogically classified two disparate groups together when there is no relationship between them, except that they both have the same attribute.

গ The writer has made a mistaken analogy between two dissimilar qualities.

ঘ The writer has used a fallacy which involves the ambiguous description of animals by their color.

ক The writer bases her argument on another argument that contains circular reasoning.

খ The writer has illogically classified two disparate groups together when there is no relationship between them, except that they both have the same attribute.

গ The writer has made a mistaken analogy between two dissimilar qualities.

ঘ The writer has used a fallacy which involves the ambiguous description of animals by their color.

ক The writer bases her argument on another argument that contains circular reasoning.

খ The writer has illogically classified two disparate groups together when there is no relationship between them, except that they both have the same attribute.

গ The writer has made a mistaken analogy between two dissimilar qualities.

ঘ The writer has used a fallacy which involves the ambiguous description of animals by their color.

ক The writer bases her argument on another argument that contains circular reasoning.

খ The writer has illogically classified two disparate groups together when there is no relationship between them, except that they both have the same attribute.

গ The writer has made a mistaken analogy between two dissimilar qualities.

ঘ The writer has used a fallacy which involves the ambiguous description of animals by their color.

ক The writer bases her argument on another argument that contains circular reasoning.

খ The writer has illogically classified two disparate groups together when there is no relationship between them, except that they both have the same attribute.

গ The writer has made a mistaken analogy between two dissimilar qualities.

ঘ The writer has used a fallacy which involves the ambiguous description of animals by their color.

ক The writer bases her argument on another argument that contains circular reasoning.

খ The writer has illogically classified two disparate groups together when there is no relationship between them, except that they both have the same attribute.

গ The writer has made a mistaken analogy between two dissimilar qualities.

ঘ The writer has used a fallacy which involves the ambiguous description of animals by their color.

ক The writer bases her argument on another argument that contains circular reasoning.

খ The writer has illogically classified two disparate groups together when there is no relationship between them, except that they both have the same attribute.

গ The writer has made a mistaken analogy between two dissimilar qualities.

ঘ The writer has used a fallacy which involves the ambiguous description of animals by their color.

ক The writer bases her argument on another argument that contains circular reasoning.

খ The writer has illogically classified two disparate groups together when there is no relationship between them, except that they both have the same attribute.

গ The writer has made a mistaken analogy between two dissimilar qualities.

ঘ The writer has used a fallacy which involves the ambiguous description of animals by their color.

ক The writer bases her argument on another argument that contains circular reasoning.

খ The writer has illogically classified two disparate groups together when there is no relationship between them, except that they both have the same attribute.

গ The writer has made a mistaken analogy between two dissimilar qualities.

ঘ The writer has used a fallacy which involves the ambiguous description of animals by their color.

ক The writer bases her argument on another argument that contains circular reasoning.

খ The writer has illogically classified two disparate groups together when there is no relationship between them, except that they both have the same attribute.

গ The writer has made a mistaken analogy between two dissimilar qualities.

ঘ The writer has used a fallacy which involves the ambiguous description of animals by their color.

ক The writer bases her argument on another argument that contains circular reasoning.

খ The writer has illogically classified two disparate groups together when there is no relationship between them, except that they both have the same attribute.

গ The writer has made a mistaken analogy between two dissimilar qualities.

ঘ The writer has used a fallacy which involves the ambiguous description of animals by their color.

ক The writer bases her argument on another argument that contains circular reasoning.

খ The writer has illogically classified two disparate groups together when there is no relationship between them, except that they both have the same attribute.

গ The writer has made a mistaken analogy between two dissimilar qualities.

ঘ The writer has used a fallacy which involves the ambiguous description of animals by their color.

ক The writer bases her argument on another argument that contains circular reasoning.

খ The writer has illogically classified two disparate groups together when there is no relationship between them, except that they both have the same attribute.

গ The writer has made a mistaken analogy between two dissimilar qualities.

ঘ The writer has used a fallacy which involves the ambiguous description of animals by their color.

ক The writer bases her argument on another argument that contains circular reasoning.

খ The writer has illogically classified two disparate groups together when there is no relationship between them, except that they both have the same attribute.

গ The writer has made a mistaken analogy between two dissimilar qualities.

ঘ The writer has used a fallacy which involves the ambiguous description of animals by their color.

ক The writer bases her argument on another argument that contains circular reasoning.

খ The writer has illogically classified two disparate groups together when there is no relationship between them, except that they both have the same attribute.

গ The writer has made a mistaken analogy between two dissimilar qualities.

ঘ The writer has used a fallacy which involves the ambiguous description of animals by their color.

ক The writer bases her argument on another argument that contains circular reasoning.

খ The writer has illogically classified two disparate groups together when there is no relationship between them, except that they both have the same attribute.

গ The writer has made a mistaken analogy between two dissimilar qualities.

ঘ The writer has used a fallacy which involves the ambiguous description of animals by their color.

ক The writer bases her argument on another argument that contains circular reasoning.

খ The writer has illogically classified two disparate groups together when there is no relationship between them, except that they both have the same attribute.

গ The writer has made a mistaken analogy between two dissimilar qualities.

ঘ The writer has used a fallacy which involves the ambiguous description of animals by their color.

ক The writer bases her argument on another argument that contains circular reasoning.

খ The writer has illogically classified two disparate groups together when there is no relationship between them, except that they both have the same attribute.

গ The writer has made a mistaken analogy between two dissimilar qualities.

ঘ The writer has used a fallacy which involves the ambiguous description of animals by their color.

ক The writer bases her argument on another argument that contains circular reasoning.

খ The writer has illogically classified two disparate groups together when there is no relationship between them, except that they both have the same attribute.

গ The writer has made a mistaken analogy between two dissimilar qualities.

ঘ The writer has used a fallacy which involves the ambiguous description of animals by their color.

ক The writer bases her argument on another argument that contains circular reasoning.

খ The writer has illogically classified two disparate groups together when there is no relationship between them, except that they both have the same attribute.

গ The writer has made a mistaken analogy between two dissimilar qualities.

ঘ The writer has used a fallacy which involves the ambiguous description of animals by their color.

ক The writer bases her argument on another argument that contains circular reasoning.

খ The writer has illogically classified two disparate groups together when there is no relationship between them, except that they both have the same attribute.

গ The writer has made a mistaken analogy between two dissimilar qualities.

ঘ The writer has used a fallacy which involves the ambiguous description of animals by their color.

ক The writer bases her argument on another argument that contains circular reasoning.

খ The writer has illogically classified two disparate groups together when there is no relationship between them, except that they both have the same attribute.

গ The writer has made a mistaken analogy between two dissimilar qualities.

ঘ The writer has used a fallacy which involves the ambiguous description of animals by their color.

ক The writer bases her argument on another argument that contains circular reasoning.

খ The writer has illogically classified two disparate groups together when there is no relationship between them, except that they both have the same attribute.

গ The writer has made a mistaken analogy between two dissimilar qualities.

ঘ The writer has used a fallacy which involves the ambiguous description of animals by their color.

ক The writer bases her argument on another argument that contains circular reasoning.

খ The writer has illogically classified two disparate groups together when there is no relationship between them, except that they both have the same attribute.

গ The writer has made a mistaken analogy between two dissimilar qualities.

ঘ The writer has used a fallacy which involves the ambiguous description of animals by their color.

ক The writer bases her argument on another argument that contains circular reasoning.

খ The writer has illogically classified two disparate groups together when there is no relationship between them, except that they both have the same attribute.

গ The writer has made a mistaken analogy between two dissimilar qualities.

ঘ The writer has used a fallacy which involves the ambiguous description of animals by their color.

ক The writer bases her argument on another argument that contains circular reasoning.

খ The writer has illogically classified two disparate groups together when there is no relationship between them, except that they both have the same attribute.

গ The writer has made a mistaken analogy between two dissimilar qualities.

ঘ The writer has used a fallacy which involves the ambiguous description of animals by their color.

ক The writer bases her argument on another argument that contains circular reasoning.

খ The writer has illogically classified two disparate groups together when there is no relationship between them, except that they both have the same attribute.

গ The writer has made a mistaken analogy between two dissimilar qualities.

ঘ The writer has used a fallacy which involves the ambiguous description of animals by their color.

ক The writer bases her argument on another argument that contains circular reasoning.

খ The writer has illogically classified two disparate groups together when there is no relationship between them, except that they both have the same attribute.

গ The writer has made a mistaken analogy between two dissimilar qualities.

ঘ The writer has used a fallacy which involves the ambiguous description of animals by their color.

ক The writer bases her argument on another argument that contains circular reasoning.

খ The writer has illogically classified two disparate groups together when there is no relationship between them, except that they both have the same attribute.

গ The writer has made a mistaken analogy between two dissimilar qualities.

ঘ The writer has used a fallacy which involves the ambiguous description of animals by their color.

ক The writer bases her argument on another argument that contains circular reasoning.

খ The writer has illogically classified two disparate groups together when there is no relationship between them, except that they both have the same attribute.

গ The writer has made a mistaken analogy between two dissimilar qualities.

ঘ The writer has used a fallacy which involves the ambiguous description of animals by their color.

ক The writer bases her argument on another argument that contains circular reasoning.

খ The writer has illogically classified two disparate groups together when there is no relationship between them, except that they both have the same attribute.

গ The writer has made a mistaken analogy between two dissimilar qualities.

ঘ The writer has used a fallacy which involves the ambiguous description of animals by their color.